The development of Trypanosoma bruceiwithin the tsetse fly midgut observed using green fluorescent trypanosomes
© Gibson and Bailey; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2003
Received: 19 February 2003
Accepted: 10 April 2003
Published: 10 April 2003
The protozoan pathogen, Trypanosoma brucei, undergoes complex cycles of differentiation and multiplication in its vector, the tsetse fly, genus Glossina. Flies are refractory to infection and resistance mechanisms operate at a number of levels and timepoints. Here we have used highly conspicuous green fluorescent trypanosomes to study the early events in establishment of infection in the fly midgut.
Less than 10% of the bloodstream form trypanosomes in the infected feed differentiated into viable procyclics. Up to day 3, trypanosomes were found in the bloodmeal in every fly examined, and increased in number between days 1 and 3. Flies dissected on days 5 and 6 fell into 2 clearly distinct groups: those with high numbers of trypanosomes and those with undetectable infection. Trypanosomes were found in the ectoperitrophic space and proventriculus from 6 days following the infective feed.
Trypanosomes that have undergone successful differentiation appear to experience an environment within the midgut suited to their unrestricted growth for the first 3 days. After this time, a process of attrition is evident in some flies, which leads to the complete elimination of infection. By day 5, flies fall into 2 groups according to the level of infection: high or undetectable. This timecourse coincides with lectin secretion, development of the PM and the digestion and movement of the bloodmeal along the gut. Further experiments are needed to discriminate between these factors.
The protozoan pathogen, Trypanosoma brucei, undergoes complex cycles of differentiation and multiplication in its vector, the tsetse fly, genus Glossina. The infection is first established in the midgut and the trypanosomes migrate anteriorly from this stronghold on a tortuous journey to the paired salivary glands, where they mature into infective metacyclics secreted in the saliva. The essential facts of the lifecycle were described by , but others have contributed important details missed in the early work, for example the role of the peritrophic membrane or matrix (PM) [2–5]. It takes a minimum of 2 weeks for T. brucei to complete the cycle, but the fly then continues to produce metacyclics for the rest of its life, potentially infecting a new host every few days when it takes a bloodmeal or even just pierces the skin with its proboscis. The cycle in the fly effectively amplifies the typically scanty parasitaemia found in the mammalian host, giving an immense advantage over simple mechanical transmission by contamination of the mouthparts with infected blood. In addition, T. brucei has the opportunity for sexual reproduction in the fly .
From the above, it would appear that the lifecycle of T. brucei is well understood. However, there remain several puzzling and contentious issues. Foremost of these is the poor efficiency of the process both in field and laboratory flies, leading some authors to conclude that the trypanosomes are poorly adapted to the tsetse vector, perhaps reflecting recent evolution, e.g. ref. . Typically far fewer than 1% of wild flies have salivary gland infections, e.g. , and even under laboratory conditions, flies are refractory to infection . For example, in experimental transmissions of various clones of T. b. brucei through our laboratory colony of Glossina morsitans morsitans, a reasonable proportion (typically one third) of flies will develop a midgut infection if given trypanosomes in their first bloodmeal, but only a proportion of these infections then go on to mature (typically less than half).
The nature of the barriers firstly to establishment of trypanosomes in the midgut, and secondly, to onward progression to maturation in the salivary glands, are uncertain. Many factors are known to influence fly infection rates, including variables specific to the trypanosome, infected host or fly. In experimental transmissions in the laboratory, trypanosome and host-specific factors can be held constant, allowing the influence of environmental or fly factors, such as immunity, to be studied. Here we have used highly conspicuous green fluorescent trypanosomes to study the early events in establishment of infection in the fly midgut.
Results and discussion
24 hour dissections of infected flies
Groups of flies were fed a single bloodmeal containing trypanosomes and were then dissected at intervals of approximately 24 hours. The guts were examined immediately as live, wet preparations by fluorescence microscopy and the position and estimated density of fluorescent trypanosomes were recorded for each fly. Samples of the infected bloodmeal from two replicate experiments were cultured in vitro to follow the timing of appearance of fluorescent trypanosomes as the bloodstream forms differentiated to procyclics, with concomitant expression of green fluorescent protein (GFP). The trypanosomes were not visible at first, but faintly fluorescent trypanosomes were just visible after 2 hours of incubation and trypanosomes were brightly fluorescent after 4 hours in culture. Fluorescent trypanosomes therefore represent only the proportion of bloodstream form trypanosomes that were viable and capable of differentiation.
Additional File 1: Movie showing live green fluorescent trypanosomes in bloodmeal in tsetse midgut (AVI 412 KB)
Additional File 2: Movie showing live green fluorescent trypanosomes in ectoperitrophic space in tsetse midgut (AVI 358 KB)
Two routes of migration into the ectoperitrophic space have been suggested previously: direct penetration of the PM or migration around the open, posterior end. EM analysis has provided convincing evidence of direct penetration through the PM in the middle region of the midgut for T. brucei [5, 10]. In agreement with this, we observed trypanosomes lying parallel to the PM in the middle portion of the midgut (e.g. Fig 2), and sometimes found large numbers of trypanosomes associated with fragments of PM during counting of homogenized guts (see below). On the other hand, the existence of a posterior route could be indicated by the flies dissected on days 4–5 after infection, in which trypanosomes were found only at the posterior end of the midgut (e.g. Fig 3). In these flies, however, trypanosomes were present in small numbers and it is difficult to see how these scanty trypanosomes could build up to the great numbers seen in infected flies from day 6 onwards. It seems more likely that the small numbers of trypanosomes found at the very end of the midgut represent a terminal stage of infection.
Additional File 3: Movie showing live green fluorescent trypanosomes in tsetse proventriculus and anterior midgut. All the green fluorescence seen is from trypanosomes; these tsetse tissues show little if any autofluorescence. (AVI 244 KB)
Quantitation of infection
The concentration of trypanosomes in the infective bloodmeal was estimated to be 4 × 103 μl -1, based on the level of parasitaemia in the blood before cryopreservation. A fly taking a typical 20 μl bloodmeal would therefore imbibe an estimated 8 × 104 trypanosomes.
We do not routinely assess the recovery of bloodstream forms after cryopreservation, so reduced viability cannot be ruled out. Neither can inability to differentiate, as it is assumed that only a proportion of bloodstream forms (the short stumpy forms) can readily transform into procyclics, because they are metabolically preadapted for transformation . It is not unrealistic that a combination of these factors might have resulted in the initial tenfold drop in numbers observed. Similarly, a drastic initial drop in numbers within 48 hours of the infected feed was recorded for experimental infection of G. m. morsitans with T. b. brucei , and about 80% of bloodstream form T. b. rhodesiense had abnormal motility and/or morphology after 10 hours in the midgut of G. m. morsitans . Evans  concluded from his successful attempts to infect flies using procyclics, that many infections were probably lost by failure of bloodstream forms to transform into procyclics.
Frequency distribution of trypanosome numbers per fly P-values from Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. * significantly different from normal distribution (p < 0.05).
No. of flies
The cause of elimination of some trypanosome infections from day 3 onwards remains to be determined. Trypanocidal lectins may play a role. There is indirect evidence that some infections are terminated by the action of trypanocidal lectins in the midgut, since the proportion of infected flies can be significantly increased by feeding glucosamine, a lectin-binding sugar [17, 18]. However, glucosamine has other effects, notably the inhibition of tsetse midgut trypsin: the same concentration of glucosamine used to enhance midgut infection rates inhibited about 40% of the proteolytic action of trypsin in vivo . In preliminary experiments, we found that feeding glucosamine in the first bloodmeal visibly slowed the rate of digestion (unpublished results). Nonetheless, the timing of lectin secretion fits with the timecourse of trypanosome elimination determined here. A slow rise in lectin levels between days 0 and 8 after eclosion was demonstrated by haemagglutination assays, with significant amounts appearing after day 3; lectin levels rose exponentially after day 8 and reached very high levels by day 14 when the experiment terminated . Interestingly, the lectin was also found to be associated with the PM, which developed to fully line the midgut within 80–90 hours of eclosion .
Exploration of the interactions of trypanosomes with components of the tsetse anti-microbial immune system is at an early stage. Flies are able to detect the presence of pathogens, including trypanosomes, in the midgut, as shown by upregulation of transcription of the anti-microbial peptides, attacin and defensin, in the fat body within a few days of infection . In addition, flies that were immune-stimulated by prior injection with bacteria showed significantly reduced infection levels with trypanosomes compared to controls when dissected 20 days after infection . Although there is clearly molecular communication between the midgut and the immune organs of the fly, the nature of the effector molecules is as yet unknown.
The timecourse of trypanosome elimination also coincides with digestion and movement of the bloodmeal along the gut: by day 4 flies held at 25°C have only a brown residue from the bloodmeal remaining at the posterior end of the midgut, and by day 5, the midgut is completely empty of any residual bloodmeal. Digestive enzymes are largely absent from the anterior midgut, being secreted in the posterior half [22–24], perhaps explaining why trypanosome survival is correlated with migration towards the anterior .
For infection to endure after day 5, trypanosomes apparently need to transfer to the ectoperitrophic space. It is possible that conditions in the digesting bloodmeal become inimical to trypanosome survival and the ectoperitrophic space offers some kind of refuge. The PM may serve to compartmentalize regions of high enzyme concentrations and intensive digestion, perhaps by binding certain molecules to its surface .
We now have a clearer picture of the early events in establishment of T. brucei in the tsetse midgut. By using GFP expression as an indicator of transformation, we were able to record a greater than tenfold disparity between the estimated number of bloodstream form trypanosomes in the infective bloodmeal compared to the number of procyclics in the midgut or in vitro culture 24 hours after infection. Therefore the initial factors inhibiting establishment of infection in the midgut are trypanosome-specific, depending on viability and ability to differentiate.
The trypanosomes that have undergone successful differentiation appear to experience an environment within the midgut suited to their unrestricted growth for the first 3 days. After this time, a process of attrition is evident, which leads to the complete elimination of infection in some flies. By day 5, flies fall into 2 groups according to the level of infection: high or undetectable. This timecourse coincides with lectin secretion, development of the PM and the digestion and movement of the bloodmeal along the gut.
Maintaining a foothold in the fly appears to depend on reaching the ectoperitrophic space. The earliest timepoint that trypanosomes were found in the ectoperitrophic space was day 6 and they were then present in great numbers. Infection at this level was maintained until the end of observations (day 14), with trypanosomes swarming in the proventriculus and midgut, but becoming less dense towards the posterior end.
The group 2 Trypanosoma brucei gambiense stock TH2 (MHOM/CI/78/TH2 [78E], ) was transfected with a construct containing the gene for green fluorescent protein under the control of the procyclin promotor as described by . Clone E21 was shown to carry the GFP gene in the ribosomal locus . Aliquots of E21 bloodstream forms in log phase growth were cryopreserved for fly infection. E21 bloodstream forms were not visibly fluorescent, but became fluorescent on transformation to procyclics due to the concomitant upregulation of the procyclin promotor.
Fly infection and dissection
The experimental flies were from the long-established Bristol laboratory colony of Glossina morsitans morsitans, originally from Zimbabwe. Male flies, approximately 18–24 hours post-eclosion, were fed a single bloodmeal of sterile horse blood containing a thawed aliquot of bloodstream form E21 trypanosomes; the final concentration of trypanosomes in the bloodmeal was estimated as 4 × 103 μl -1. Flies were subsequently maintained in small cages containing 3 – 5 flies without feeding for up to 6 days and longer if given a second bloodmeal of sterile horse blood. Dissection took place at approximately 24 hour intervals. Flies were briefly chilled before dissection of the whole posterior gut from the proventriculus to the rectum.
Whole tsetse midguts were dissected into a drop of PBS and viewed as wet mounts. A DMRB microscope (Leica) equipped with either a 24 bit Colour Coolview camera (Photonic Science) or 10 bit monochrome Megaview II camera (Norfolk Analytical) was used for fluorescence and brightfield microscopy, with ImagePro Plus software (Photonic Science) or analySIS software (Norfolk Analytical) respectively. Multiple images captured with a minimum timelapse were assembled to create video sequences (ImagePro Plus). Results were compiled from 5 batches of flies infected in separate experiments.
Counting and statistics
For counting trypanosomes in individual flies, the whole abdomen, including the posterior gut with the proventriculus, was placed in 50 μl of PBS in a microcentrifuge tube and thoroughly disrupted using a teflon pestle. The trypanosomes were fixed by adding paraformaldehyde to a final concentration of 0.1 % w/v in PBS and counted immediately using a haemocytometer. Only fluorescent trypanosomes were counted. The lower limit of detection was 18 trypanosomes per fly, based on the number of trypanosomes present if only 1 trypanosome was recorded in 6 haemocytometer counts. Seven replicate experiments were carried out to give adequate numbers of flies at each time point.
The frequency distribution of trypanosome numbers in flies was analysed for conformity to a normal distribution using a single-sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov test (SPSS).
We thank Mrs Jenny Berry and the International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, for providing tsetse flies and Dr Lewis Bingle for generating the recombinant trypanosome clone. We thank The Wellcome Trust for funding.
- Robertson M: Notes on the life-history of Trypanosoma gambiense, with a brief reference to the cycles of Trypanosoma nanum and Trypanosoma pecorum in Glossina palpalis. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1913, 203: 161-184.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lewis EA, Langridge WP: Developmental forms of Trypanosoma brucei in the "saliva" of Glossina pallidipes and G. austeni. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 1947, 41: 6-13.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Van den Abbeele J, Claes Y, Van Bockstaele D, Le Ray D, Coosemans M: Trypanosoma brucei spp. development in the tsetse fly: characterization of the post-mesocyclic stages in the foregut and proboscis. Parasitology. 1999, 118: 469-478. 10.1017/S0031182099004217.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tetley L, Vickerman K: Differentiation in Trypanosoma brucei: host-parasite cell junctions and their persistence during acquisition of the variable antigen coat. J Cell Sci. 1985, 74: 1-19.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Evans DA, Ellis DE: Recent observations on the behaviour of certain trypanosomes within their insect hosts. Adv Parasitol. 1983, 22: 1-42.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jenni L, Marti S, Schweizer J, Betschart B, Lepage RWF, Wells JM, Tait A, Paindavoine P, Pays E, Steinert M: Hybrid formation between African trypanosomes during cyclical transmission. Nature. 1986, 322: 173-175.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hoare CA: The Trypanosomes of Mammals. 1972, Oxford, Blackwell Scientific PublicationsGoogle Scholar
- Lloyd L, Johnson WB: The trypanosome infections of tsetse flies in northern Nigeria and a new method of estimation. Bull Entomol Res. 1924, 14: 265-288.Google Scholar
- Maudlin I: Transmission of African trypanosomiasis:Interactions among tsetse immune system, symbionts, and parasites. Advances in Disease Vector Research. 1991, 7: 117-148.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ellis DS, Evans DA: Passage of Trypanosoma brucei rhodesiense through the peitrophic membrane of Glossina morsitans morsitans. Nature. 1977, 267: 834-835.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pearson TW, Beecroft RP, Welburn SC, Ruepp S, Roditi I, Hwa KY, Englund PT, Wells CW, Murphy NB: The major cell surface glycoprotein procyclin is a receptor for induction of a novel form of cell death in African trypanosomes in vitro. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 2000, 111: 333-349. 10.1016/S0166-6851(00)00327-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Vickerman K: Polymorphism and mitochondrial activity in sleeping sickness trypanosomes. Nature. 1965, 208: 762-766.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Turner CM, Barry JD, Vickerman K: Loss of variable antigen during transformation of Trypanosoma brucei rhodesiense from bloodstream to procyclic forms in the tsetse fly. Parasitol Res. 1988, 74: 507-511.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Evans DA: Cyclical transmission of Trypanosoma brucei rhodesiense and Trypanosoma congolense by tsetse flies infected with culture form procyclic trypanosomes. J Protozool. 1979, 26: 425-427.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dipeolu OO, Adam KMG: On the use of membrane feeding to study the development of Trypanosoma brucei in Glossina. Acta Trop. 1974, 31: 185-201.Google Scholar
- Welburn SC, Maudlin I, Ellis DS: Rate of trypanosome killing by lectins in midguts of different species and strains of Glossina. Med Vet Entomol. 1989, 3: 77-82.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Maudlin I, Welburn SC: Lectin mediated establishment of midgut infections of Trypanosoma congolense and Trypanosoma brucei in Glossina morsitans. Trop Med Parasitol. 1987, 38: 167-170.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mihok S, Otieno LH, Darji N, Munyinyi D: Influence of D(+)-glucosamine on infection rates and parasite loads in tsetse flies (Glossina spp.) infected with Trypanosoma brucei. Acta Trop. 1992, 51: 217-228.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Osir EO, Imbuga MO, Onyango P: Inhibition of Glossina morsitans midgut trypsin activity by D-glucosamine. Parasitol Res. 1993, 79: 93-97.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lehane MJ, Msangi AR: Lectin and peritrophic membrane development in the gut of Glossina m.morsitans and a discussion of their role in protecting the fly against trypanosome infection. Med Vet Entomol. 1991, 5: 495-501.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hao ZR, Kasumba I, Lehane MJ, Gibson WC, Kwon J, Aksoy S: Tsetse immune responses and trypanosome transmission: Implications for the development of tsetse-based strategies to reduce trypanosomiasis. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2001, 98: 12648-12653. 10.1073/pnas.221363798.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gooding RH: Digestive processes of haematophagous insects: control of trypsin secretion in Glossina morsitans. J Insect Physiol. 1974, 20: 957-964. 10.1016/0022-1910(74)90137-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lester HMO, Lloyd L: Notes on the process of digestion in tsetse flies. Bull Entomol Res. 1928, 19: 31-60.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wigglesworth VB: Digestion in the tsetse fly:a study of structure and function. Parasitology. 1929, 21: 288-321.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lehane MJ: Peritrophic matrix structure and function. Annu Rev Entomol. 1997, 42: 525-550. 10.1146/annurev.ento.42.1.525.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mehlitz D, Zillmann U, Scott CM, Godfrey DG: Epidemiological studies on the animal reservoir of gambiense sleeping sickness. III. Characterisation of Trypanozoon stocks by isoenzymes and sensitivity to human serum. Tropenmed Parasitol. 1982, 33: 113-118.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bingle LE, Eastlake JL, Bailey M, Gibson WC: A novel GFP approach for the analysis of genetic exchange in trypanosomes allowing the in situ detection of mating events. Microbiology. 2001, 147: 3231-3240.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article: verbatim copying and redistribution of this article are permitted in all media for any purpose, provided this notice is preserved along with the article's original URL.